距离全国统考仅有:-2

宏博太奇考研,宏博太奇教育

您现在的位置: > MPAccMPAcc备考MPAcc英语 > 2015年MPAcc英语阅读理解题型训练及答案(2)

2015年MPAcc英语阅读理解题型训练及答案(2)

2014-10-09 09:24:10 阅读:(宏博太奇考研

  太奇MPAcc“每日一练”进行中。十一长假转瞬即逝,也预示着2015年管理类联考(MPAcc)考试网上正式报名阶段即将于10月10日开启。此时,MPAcc考生们普遍处于下半年总 复习备考,针对MPAcc考研英语,太奇教育结合多年考研辅导经验,独具特色的太奇学习法让每一位太奇学员受益匪浅。太奇MPAcc为2015年 MPAcc备考考生们整理MPAcc英语阅读理解题型训练及参考答案,希望MPAcc考生们可以借助试题提高解题速度。

  It is said that the public and Congressional concern about deceptive (欺骗性的) packaging rumpus (喧嚣) started because Senator Hart discovered that the boxes of cereals consumed by him, Mrs. Hart, and their children were becoming higher and narrower, with a decline of net weight from 12 to 10-1/2 ounces, without any reduction in price. There were still twelve biscuits, but they had been reduced in size. Later, the Senator rightly complained of a store- bought pie in a handsomely illustrated box that pictured, in a single slice, almost as many cherries as there were in the whole pie. The manufacturer who increases the unit price of his product by changing his package size to lower the quantity delivered can, without undue hardship, put his product into boxes, bags, and tins that will contain even 4-ounce, 8-ounce, one-pound, two-pound quantities of breakfast foods, cake mixes, etc. A study of drugstore (杂货店) and supermarket shelves will convince any observer that all possible sizes and shapes of boxes, jars, bottles, and tins are in use at the same time, and, as the package journals show, week by week, there is never any hesitation in introducing a new size and shape of box or bottle when it aids in product differentiation. The producers of packaged products argue strongly against changing sizes of packages to contain even weights and volumes, but no one in the trade comments unfavorably on the huge costs incurred by endless changes of package sizes, materials, shape, art work, and net weights that are used for improving a product's market position.

  When a packaging expert explained that he was able to multiply the price of hard sweets by 2.5, from $1 to $ 2.50 by changing to a fancy jar, or that he had made a 5-ounce bottle look as though it held 8 ounces, he was in effect telling the public that packaging can be a very expensive luxury. It evidently does come high, when an average family pays about $ 200 a year for bottles, cans, boxes, jars and other containers, most of which can't be used for anything but stuffing the garbage can.

  1. What started the public and Congressional concern about deceptive packaging rumpus?

  A. Consumers' complaints about the changes in package size.

  B. Expensive packaging for poor quality products.

  C. A senator's discovery of the tricks in packaging.

  D. The rise in the unit price for many products.

  2. The word "undue" (Line 2, Para. 2) means " ".

  A. improper

  C. unexpected

  B. adequate

  D. excessive

1 2
在线客服

微信

点我咨询

联系电话

07713110323